node-pty@0.9.0 install /home/parallels/enigma-bbs/node_modules/node-pty
node scripts/install.js
Just some more detail.
make: g++: Command not found
make: g++: Command not foundI think ^ this is your problem. This can likely be remedied with 'sudo apt install build-essential'
--- ENiGMA 1/2 v0.0.12-beta (linux; x64; 12.13.1)NuSkooler
Xibalba BBS @ xibalba.l33t.codes / 44510(telnet) 44511(ssh)
ENiGMA 1/2 BBS WHQ | Phenom | 67 | iMPURE | ACiDic
Beat me to it, but +1 :Dmake: g++: Command not foundI think ^ this is your problem. This can likely be remedied with 'sudo
apt install build-essential'
I think ^ this is your problem. This can likely be remedied with
'sudo apt install build-essential'
~/enigma-bbs$ ./oputil.js config new internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:834 throw err; ^
--- ENiGMA 1/2 v0.0.12-beta (linux; x64; 12.13.1)NuSkooler
Xibalba BBS @ xibalba.l33t.codes / 44510(telnet) 44511(ssh)
ENiGMA 1/2 BBS WHQ | Phenom | 67 | iMPURE | ACiDic
If there are no errors (g++/etc.) you should have clean modules.
So just a general update and first impressions from ENiGMA. It's pretty slick. It's fast as hell. I'm really impressed by the amount, and clarity, of both the documentation on the web, and the comments in the config files and such. Again, the documention on the web, with the layout and color scheme and markup is just damn sexy.
The lack of a config utility is somewhat of a bummer. I don't mind manually editing config files -- but it's a higher barrier to setup. I think if I was really into JS this would be a great board to take and use as the backbone of a super customized setup -- you could do pretty much anything with it.
I'm just generally curious, are you done with the development? Or are you considering adding things like a configuration utility?
--- ENiGMA 1/2 v0.0.12-beta (linux; x64; 12.13.1)NuSkooler
Xibalba BBS @ xibalba.l33t.codes / 44510(telnet) 44511(ssh)
ENiGMA 1/2 BBS WHQ | Phenom | 67 | iMPURE | ACiDic
A couple people have actually said they were going to create one... started, then I imagine found what I said above and bailed out on it :D
But as I continued to use enigma, I spent less and less time in the main config file itself, and more time in the menu config files and realized I didn't actually need it. And I think enigma has a way to split up config files so it's not so large to deal with?
Plus, it's actually non-trivial once you start looking at the menus, adding light bars, selection logic, etc.
Anyway, I def. see how there's a potential hurdle for folks who may be used to an gui editor (like mystic) but I'd say don't let that deter anyone from trying enigma. Like the OP said -- enigma is fast, and so very flexible... and it's open source!
--- ENiGMA 1/2 v0.0.12-beta (linux; x64; 12.13.1)NuSkooler
Xibalba BBS @ xibalba.l33t.codes / 44510(telnet) 44511(ssh)
ENiGMA 1/2 BBS WHQ | Phenom | 67 | iMPURE | ACiDic
Sysop: | Immortal |
---|---|
Location: | Spanish Fork, UT |
Users: | 15 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 21:14:34 |
Calls: | 514 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 3,435 |
Messages: | 99,158 |