Also I'd prefer not to share my infinite money with tech
giants. If I wanted to _buy_ a solution, I'd rather hire
somebody to hack something together instead of purchasing a
premade appliance from a tech giant.
Not really
When somebody hires me to hack something together I usually dig into a dumpster or buy some used stuff for 5 bucks.
When I had a new roof put on, I had them run a cable for me
from where the TV is in the living room to where the router
lives in my office so I don't have to deal with weak network
connectivity between the two. Unfortunately it was only CAT5
and not CAT6. Maybe next time I get the roof done, I'll rerun
a new cable.
* Origin: my little micronet point (618:510/1.1)
* Origin: my little micronet point (618:510/1.1)
Sorry, you may have had some trouble getting through earlier today. I
was upgrading synchronet..
Should be easier in future, though!
Hello Nelgin!
** On Wednesday 30.12.20 - 13:52, Nelgin wrote to Kurt Weiske:
When I had a new roof put on, I had them run a cable for me
from where the TV is in the living room to where the router
lives in my office so I don't have to deal with weak network
connectivity between the two. Unfortunately it was only CAT5
and not CAT6. Maybe next time I get the roof done, I'll rerun
a new cable.
Is it a complex run above the ceiling? Is the cable "secured" or
tied down enroute? If it isn't tied down, why not just thread/tie
one of the new CAT6 to the old CAT5 and pull the old CAT5 out the
other end?
Actually, I'm getting new furniture and probably going to
move the TV across the room so it'll actually be closer to
the router and I wouldn't really be able to run a cable since
I have wood floors and no carpet. I can't put it behind the
quarter rounds because I already have audio cable buried
under those.
Should be easier in future, though!
The situation encouraged me to figure out how I can redirect my
outbound to the other Micronet boss system.
Then.. why not try one of those wall-plug-based extenders:
powerline network adaptors. They use the house electrical wiring
to extend your network.
Then.. why not try one of those wall-plug-based extenders:
powerline network adaptors. They use the house electrical
wiring to extend your network.
Another option is MOCA, which allows you to use the COAX
which may already be in your home as Ethernet. MOCA 2.0
media converters support up to a gigabit, and are around
$100 a pair. It introduces about 4ms of lag. Not too bad.
I just looked on Amazon and they now have a MOCA 2.5 adaptor which supports 2.5 gigabit. Freaking Sweet! $199 a pair.
I considered the same CD->MP3 project too, until I
calculated just how much time it would take and the extra
HDD/SDD expense (and the resources for backups) that it
would require to store the rips of over 2000 CDs
Just use something like Soulseek and download them rather
than rip them.
August Abolins wrote to Nelgin <=-
Then.. why not try one of those wall-plug-based extenders:
powerline network adaptors. They use the house electrical wiring
to extend your network.
Bob Roberts wrote to August Abolins <=-
I just looked on Amazon and they now have a MOCA 2.5 adaptor which supports 2.5 gigabit. Freaking Sweet! $199 a pair.
Do you have any insight into how to get MOCA working when you have Comcast
modems and digital boxes? Rumor has it that Comcast uses MOCA to connect their digital streaming extension boxes to the main DVR, and that multiple
MOCA networks won't run on the same wire.
I'd love to be able to configure a MOCA device to talk directly to the Comcast modem to extend the IP network to another floor, or use them in a pair like powerline adapters.
I seem to remember there were two competing IP over Coax technologies for BR> homes. Depending on how your coax is routed and split sometimes you can BR> isolate segments of it.
Bob Roberts wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
Does your comcast modem use Coax to feed video to your cable boxes? Is
it a whole-home-DVR type situation?
The original builder (for this whole neighbourhood) had the local cable provider come in to run coax, cat3 (for phone) and cat5e to each bedroom, only coax in the living rooms and one cat3 in the kitchen for some reason.
I like how they ran the cables, everything is its own run and terminates in the basement near the breaker panel. For the coax, they all go to a splitter that's fed from a coax coming in from the street. This sounds like it would be easy to add a MOCA adapter if I wanted a 2nd network connection in any of the bedrooms.
Cable comes into my house, and at the main location we have a splitter. One cable line goes to the cable/voice modem, the other to the DVR. I have remote digital boxes connected to other TVs that can communicate via MOCA/Cable with the DVR, and play content saved on the main DVR.
Buying CDRs in bulk from strange internet sites that got
them direct from Tokyo where the best ones were made.
Verbatium blue bottoms were my prize. Then spindles started
showing up at best buy. "50 CDRWs for $16! But they are
cheap ones. I'll get them anyways for dumb stuff, but I'll
keep my Verbatium blue bottoms for important things."
Buying big stacks of jewel cases and snapping them together.
I still have some spindles I never used. I bet they are
long rotted. I probably have a thousand CDRs in stacks
that are all useless now.
This became less of an issue once my sister and I had our
own Columbia House subscriptions and could get our own CDs.
...Remember the sticker sheets the would email, and you
could get 10 CD's for a penny, but only if you bought 5 more
at full price in a year? I would sit there are carefully
tear off the ones I wanted, trying to figure out what the
best 10 would be, prioritizing them. After you signed up
waiting waiting for that folded cardboard box with the stack
of CDs. So exciting! Then they would mail you a card and
you'd have to decline whatever garbage they wanted to send
you.
I was in a Science Fiction book club that operated the same way. The books were all hard covers, but they were specially printed for the club and you could tell from the size they were "club editions" so the used book shop wouldn't give as much in trade for them.
When I encountered CD-RWs I thought I had the ultimate solution
for making my MP3 or audio discs. But most of those simply
refused to burn after a handful erasures.
I've read that the writeable DVDs were more prone to "rot" than
CD-Rs.
When I encountered CD-RWs I thought I had the ultimate
solution..
I never got into the Rewritables. By the time they were
affordable, CDRs were so dirt cheap it was easier to just
junk the old CDR and burn a new one.
My 2000+ collection acts almost like that now! I have piles..
I do miss being able to sit cross legged on the floor and look at all the CD's on the shelf, resorting ones that had been replaced incorrectly, and "remembering" CDs I had long forgotten.
One day, I would like to dedicate an old laptop as the Spotify
server with collections that I have pulled for offline play
(Spotify allows this). And when I want new music for offline
play, simply take the laptop with me to my DSL service at the
shop in town.
Just wanted to note you could do this with a phone or tablet as well,
both allow you to cache offline spotify libraries.
I was just thinking about this last night! Remember the sticker sheets thewould email, and you could get 10 CD's for a penny, but only if you bought 5more at full price in a year?
After you signed up waiting waiting for that folded cardboard box withthe BR> stack of CDs. So exciting!
Then they would mail you a card and you'd haveto decline whatever garbage BR> they wanted to send you.
I recall scouring the internet for CDRW specs, trying to find the best drivewhich could rip fast and with accuracy, while also writing all the various formats.
It was so exiciting to make the jump from 4x to 8x writing. Then pretty BR> soon you have 24x.
I still have some spindles I never used. I bet theyare long rotted. I BR> probably have a thousand CDRs in stacks that are alluseless now.
To this day (10 years later), I still haven't found a few of the
correct cases for the CDs that I'd like to put away properly.
But thankfully, it is just a few.
I don't use original CDs in the car. I don't want them to get damaged due to cold or heat. I just clone the CD and have a collection of copies in
the car.
However, my home 5-disc player wouldn't support the CD-RW AUDIO
variety. I could only use those in the car's MP3/WMA/AUDIO
player. That was fine for a while, but then I missed playing
those collections in the house. But making an extra copy from the
CD-RW onto CD-R was ok.
My first burner was an external HP 1x burner that attached to a parallel port. You had to put the CDs
in a caddy and then that caddy into the burner.
It was reliable for the most part, I didn't have a lot of failed discs, though I did have some. Which
did sting back then when they did fail as discs were about $5 /ea.
Hello Bob!
** On Sunday 03.01.21 - 10:10, Bob Roberts wrote to Warpslide:
Buying CDRs in bulk from strange internet sites that got
them direct from Tokyo where the best ones were made.
Verbatium blue bottoms were my prize. Then spindles started
showing up at best buy. "50 CDRWs for $16! But they are
cheap ones. I'll get them anyways for dumb stuff, but I'll
keep my Verbatium blue bottoms for important things."
Buying big stacks of jewel cases and snapping them together.
I still have some spindles I never used. I bet they are
long rotted. I probably have a thousand CDRs in stacks
that are all useless now.
I've read that the writeable DVDs were more prone to "rot" than
CD-Rs.
My CD-R collections from the early 2000s still play quite well
[as long as I didn't try to maximize the 80min capacity close to
79:59] ;) Later, I learned about the blue ones too, and stuck
to those.
When I encountered CD-RWs I thought I had the ultimate solution
for making my MP3 or audio discs. But most of those simply
refused to burn after a handful erasures.
..I could only use those in the car's MP3/WMA/AUDIO
player..
Those were the best. When I got a CD player in my car that could play a data disc of MP3s, I would burn big collections, organized by folder, and be able to play almost anything in the car.
Later we had a car with a hard drive in it somewhere, you could insert a Music disc and it would "rip" it to the internal hard drive. It was too slow to rip thou and we never really used it.
The current car doesn't even have a CD player. It just has
Bluetooth so you can stream off your phone to the stereo...
plus Car Play / Android Audio.
When I encountered CD-RWs I thought I had the ultimate
solution for making my MP3 or audio discs. But most of those
simply refused to burn after a handful erasures.
I got a bluray burner with the idea that I can back my
Windows system up from time to time. Then I realized the cost
of the disks (50 pack of 25GB Bdr discs at $51.99) would
equal about 1.25tb of space. I can get a 12TB external USB
drive for $200. Burning discs just isn't time and cost
efficient.
I would just reserve to use those for movies that exceed 4GB FAT
file size barrier and that I would want to be somewhat durable
and erasable. Meanwhile, a couple of 64GB USB thumbdrives have
been just fine for most everything I watch.
August Abolins wrote to Bob Roberts <=-
I have never heard of a car maker offering onboard hdd for music
purposes.
The current car doesn't even have a CD player. It just has
Bluetooth so you can stream off your phone to the stereo...
plus Car Play / Android Audio.
I tried the FM-transmitter method. It wasn't bad for podcasts,
but it was very poor quality for music. Some engine noise/static
was always present.
Andrea's accent accepts a USB stick and she loves that as she can
copy songs / create playlists at home on her laptop and pop it into
the car and select what she wants.
I tried the FM-transmitter method. It wasn't bad for podcasts..
I have a very good FM transmitter from China that comes with a
switch "Do not use this switch if in usa/canada" that of course I
flipped seems to give it so much power that I'm my own radio station.
LOL
My car is so old is has a cassette player not a CD player. ;)
Gmail calls those things "labels". You create a label, and
then assign any emails you want to that label. It's
effectively a folder. The benefit is that those newly
labelled messages will then not clutter your standard Inbox.
Under my INBOX I have a list of folders for each year with critical emails I want to keep so
INBOX
2013
2014
2015
etc...
I can create text labels. I don't know why you are limited to
just numbering them.
Yes, I know how they work, but you cannot change the order from alphabetical unless you use a numbering system in certain circumstances.
The UNSEND feature is pretty cool.Only for upto 30 seconds it is, and then it isn't.
August wrote:
I would just reserve to use those for movies that exceed 4GB FAT
file size barrier and that I would want to be somewhat durable
and erasable. Meanwhile, a couple of 64GB USB thumbdrives have
been just fine for most everything I watch.
My Linux box has an LV with 4 x cheap 4TB hard drives in a RAID 10 configuration so I have plenty of storage for my movies and CDs. I have a 6TB drive to which I rsync on a regular basis /etc /home (which are on a mirrored pair of 250GB SSD drives) and everything else on the hard drives. With plenty of space left over to keep individual files that may be of importance. So I have the peace of mind of mirrored copies plus a local backup. I do need to setup my remote backup again for critial files. I don't consider 2GB of movies and music to be critical, I can get those back. It's mostly documents and photos.
My Linux box has an LV with 4 x cheap 4TB hard drives in a RAID 10 configuration so I have plenty of storage for my movies and CDs.
I don't consider 2GB of movies and music to be critical, I can get
those back. It's mostly documents and photos.
AUGUST ABOLINS wrote to NELGIN <=-
Spotify is a much easier route, and there is no guilty
conscience. A bonus with SPotify is that it does a really good
AUGUST ABOLINS wrote to NELGIN <=-
Spotify is a great choice. I was a big fan/user of Google
Play Music for a long time, and loved their service not only
for streaming stuff I didn't have, but I could upload my
whole collection and have everything available for
streaming. But Google Music became Youtube Music and I just
could not get into it. So I switched to Spotify.
Spotify's desktop client will play locally stored MP3s (but the
interface sucks for this purpose unless you create playlists
These options along with some very good quality In Ear Monitors has changed my listening habits a lot! But I still miss sitting down on the floor and reading album covers while listening :)
iTunes offered an interesting "uploads" option. (Not sure if they
still do) ..but you could upload a basic quality .mp3 version of
anything you had, and they would replace it with a higher quality version. Then you could stream that anywhere you wanted.
It's called iTunes Match, and it costs $25/year if you don't have an
Apple Music subscription. But if you do it's included... not sure if there is much of a point to it anymore... in this age of streaming music.
August Abolins wrote to Tiny <=-
Storing music onto it was an easy drag and drop with the
computer: no special app (like iTunes) required.
switch "Do not use this switch if in usa/canada" that of course I
flipped seems to give it so much power that I'm my own radio station.
That is interesting, and funny.
I had a fellow drop into my shop on Saturday, and we talked about
cassette players and 8-track. He was a collector of those things
and the tapes that go along with it.
August Abolins wrote to Tiny <=-
Storing music onto it was an easy drag and drop with the
computer: no special app (like iTunes) required.
That's how she does it. On her computer she uses VLC to play
music and she copys what she wants to hear on the stick. It
works for both of us that way. (I can't deal with itunes to
save my life)
It would seem far more entertaining to stream music from a vastly
larger catalog from which you can discover new stuff.
I do agree with you. I think streaming is the way to go. However the
one drawback is that the licensing agreements are always changing. I listen to a lot of obscure indie electronic acts, and sometimes their catalogs disappear from streaming... but usually they come back.
Recently a band I really like "Made In Heights" disappeared from all streaming platforms because of a dispute between the band members who didn't sign the new contract in time for renewal. One of the band
members released all the music in MP3 and posted it online -- so I was able to retrieve it. However that won't always be the case.
I'm not sure if there are still any major holdouts for streaming. For awhile it was Led Zeppelin, Prince, the Beatles, Tool, and Taylor Swift but they are all streaming now.
Recently a band I really like "Made In Heights" disappeared from all
streaming platforms because of a dispute between the band members who
didn't sign the new contract in time for renewal. One of the band
That got me curious. I found a download link for Made In Heights
at mediafire. I have to check out your interest! ;)
I remember some fuss from the holdouts. From Swift I recall that
she was demanding a bigger cut, or something like that.
August Abolins wrote to Tiny <=-
Save for the concept of paying for low quality and DRM's files
that only play with iTunes, the player itself is a good
"database" tool for a collection. It works really fine for the
material I rip lossless from CDs and store it.
Save for the concept of paying for low quality and DRM's files
that only play with iTunes, the player itself is a good
"database" tool for a collection. It works really fine for the
material I rip lossless from CDs and store it.
Never thought I'd find anyone who liked that program. LOL
We just can't deal with it. Tried many times and failed.
I found a way to use media monkey to sync to my ipad though
so it's okay. Of course I haven't listened to music that
way in over a year now.
AUGUST ABOLINS wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=-
iTunes offered an interesting "uploads" option. (Not sure if they
still do) ..but you could upload a basic quality .mp3 version of
anything you had, and they would replace it with a higher quality
version. Then you could stream that anywhere you wanted.
I pondered about that, and decided not to bother.
play the local files. I would use iTunes' player instead. Infact,music discovery with Spotify is so much more fun.
I haven't been playing any of my local files because the new AA>
Well.. what precludes you to buy vinyl and relive those times?!
;) Apparently, vinyl has a sort of comeback in the last few
years. But the prices of $20+ is a bit steep, I would think.
But I'd love to play some old LPs. But I just really need a new
That got me curious. I found a download link for Made In Heights
at mediafire. I have to check out your interest! ;)
Very cool. Let me know what you think. Their most popular song is Murakami on "Without My Enemy What Would I Do".
But I like all their songs. It's a shame they seem to be on
the path to break up, but maybe it will free them to take on
new projects.
..Bigger cut for Taytay. She's been fighting for control of
her Masters and they were recently sold from under her for a
second time just recently. These are the Masters from her
first 10(?) albums, so worth quite a bit. Apparently she is
now rerecording every song now, so she can release them to
try to undermine the value of the old Masters. We shall
see!
Very cool. Let me know what you think. Their most popular song is
Murakami on "Without My Enemy What Would I Do".
Murakami.. is that the one that starts with what sounds like a
record playing backwards?
I like what I hear. I haven't heard everything though. I notice
that some of the recordings are just pure instramental.
How would this music be classified: industrial pop?
The music and vocals also reminds of a less breathy Dido.
The beats and minimalistic music treatment reminds me of a
Canadian duo called Timbuk2 (but I can't find the CD right now)
Rerecoring the catalog sounds like a good tactic to undercut the
value of the originals, but rarely have anyone's re-recorded
versions stood up, IMHO. There are exceptions though. Can't
think of anything right now.
BTW.. I overheard in another echo that you were looking for some
offline reader alternatives. I recommend OpenXP! See tear line.
To see screenshots and for more information, see:
iTunes offered an interesting "uploads" option..
I remember something about that, and I think I did do it and if I
remember correctly, once I linked it to my local mp3s, it added them to
my iTunes library, but deleted them off my hard drive and that really pissed me off and I haven't used iTunes since.
;) Apparently, vinyl has a sort of comeback..
No kidding! They have been pricing new vinyl pretty high. But I have
also noticed they are making them a lot heavier. That might have
something to do with the cost, but the prices are more than I would
have expected. $9.99 for downloadable album, $14.99 for CD, $20+ for colored vinyl? WHat?
But I'd love to play some old LPs. But I just really need a new
I no longer really have a "HiFi" and listen with headphones or IEMs
only.
AUGUST ABOLINS wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=-
According to some googling about this, the local delete was an
option when prompted to do so. So.. you didn't have to lose thos
files.
The above sounds confusing.
Someone mentioned that the LPs are indeed heavier. Interesting.
I remember the K-tel LPs; they seemed to get thinner with every
release. The sample records on plastic that were sometimes
featured in magazines were fun to play.
It is very nice to be able to crank up the sound and enjoy the chestpounting bass, have the freedom to walk around and not be
encumbered with ear pieces or headphones pressing against the
ears. Live recordings are especially fun because it sounds like
the party is right there in the room.
I don't have extraordinarly high-end speakers, but they are
Advent towers with 8" woofers. The original woofers "rotted" out
around the rims. I found a place that would repair them. I just
..I have gotten a few LP's recently, just for
collector purposes and they are indeed heavier.
It is very nice to be able to crank up the sound..
Now divorced, which is great, but I live in an upstairs apartment, so I don't want to piss off my neighbors :)
I have a high end pair of IEMs and they sound amazing, but I do miss "feeling" the music (bass).
..The original woofers "rotted" out around the rims.
When I was younger I had a set of speakers that did that,
tried to fix them myself with fingernail polish, but it
didn't last long LOL. I could not afford to actually get the
fixed at the time. The good ole days.
AUGUST ABOLINS wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=-
Maybe you can find out when your neighbors downstairs would be
away. I lived in apartments most of the time. Two of my last
apartments were in very modern buildings, THICK solid concrete
floors and walls between units. I was impressed with the sound
to me. I can see my next closest neighbour across the lake, but
that is atleast 0.5km away. Often I will play loud well into the
early hours.
One day I decided I wanted to play them really loud, but I heard
the occassional mechanical KLUNK in sync with the normal beats.
Then, I thought that the woofers were "blown out" (although I
These days I do enjoy seeing other peoples systems. I found a guy on youtube that shows high end systems, and I mean high end. Systems over
50k upwards to 200-300k It's fun to see how other people spend all
their gobs of cash LOL.
BOB ROBERTS wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=-
I always enjoy the Home theater build threads on Reddit/r/hometheater. Looking at ultra-high-end home theaters is great.
The guy on youtube is Steve Guttenberg (Audiophiliac) - seems like he
does weekly shows and it is really interesting to watch. Link to his profile below.
The guy on youtube is Steve Guttenberg (Audiophiliac) - seems like he
does weekly shows and it is really interesting to watch. Link to his profile below.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9wBmplRUhaCi-aNrkfgeTg
(I looked for a friendly URL, but didn't see one)
My car is so old is has a cassette player not a CD player. ;)
My current apartment is a testing ground for me.. ..It is^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
quiet and gated, so I try to help keep it that way (quiet).
These days I do enjoy seeing other peoples systems. I found
a guy on youtube that shows high end systems, and I mean
high end. Systems over 50k upwards to 200-300k It's fun to
see how other people spend all their gobs of cash LOL.
great for rock - no "dynamics" he called it. Spot on. I heard
Klipsch horn speakers and they sounded great for everything. I
would luv to have a pair of those.
AUGUST ABOLINS wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=-
great for rock - no "dynamics" he called it. Spot on. I heard
Klipsch horn speakers and they sounded great for everything. I
would luv to have a pair of those.
I had a little musical project at that time. I would create
musical parodies in the style of "Mr.Jaws":
I was a huge hit. I made a total of three parodies during my
last two years in highschool.
Anyway.. the horn speakers had me hooked from then on.
BOB ROBERTS wrote to AUGUST ABOLINS <=-
might entice me if I was building a dedicated 2 channel listening room.
The problem is the speaker placement MUST be in the corners.
The closest I've come is with PA systems (like you!) I am an sound engineer flunkie, but got to mess with some really nice systems. Most would have horns for high/mids and 18" or 24" subs. Chest slapping dynamics. Boy those where some fun times!
Yea you can't beat a well designed horn system. I have heard some
crappy ones too, but the majority of them are amazing.
..His pride and joy was a VW Bug (convertable) with 4 18"s
in the back seat powered by several Rockford Fosgates.
it really went crazy then (and I thought the Bug was crazy).
AUGUST ABOLINS wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=-
Many of today's speaker pairs can't be all that bad if they are
priced for the audiophile and still in business after decades.
I was partial to owning a pair of Polks at one time.
Nothing beats listening to music in the open air.
I have some Shure SE535's that are beyond great when I am listening to jazz or classical music. But they are not that great for the Metal
music that I enjoy most. Where as my Shure SE215's are great for Metal,
I also have a pair of custom Ultimate Ears IEMs that are freaking
amazing and they are best with jazz and classical, but still sound
I don't often listen via headphones at home -- lucky enough
to have a wife that tolerates my music. But I run audio
from my computer thru a Peachtree Audio DAC and out to KRK
Rokit Monitors.
My first pair of monitor/shelf design were the Realistic Minimus
series in the 80s. Technically, they were the same as the Kosch
My first pair of monitor/shelf design were the Realistic Minimus
series in the 80s. Technically, they were the same as the Kosch
of the same type, made in the same factories, but branded as
Realistic. I purchased 2 pairs of the larger Minimus-77; at
to have a wife that tolerates my music. But I run audio
from my computer thru a Peachtree Audio DAC and out to KRK
Rokit Monitors.
Interesting. Never heard of those. There seems to be even more
brands of speakers out there than in the past.
Whoops. Make that Bose, not Kosch. I think I was still
dreaming of owning Klipsch speakers someday and merged that with remembering the Bose, somehow.
BOB ROBERTS wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=-
You using a DAC or Amp with those? If so which one?
I don't often listen via headphones at home -- lucky enough to have a
wife that tolerates my music. But I run audio from my computer thru a Peachtree Audio DAC and out to KRK Rokit Monitors.
AUGUST ABOLINS wrote to BOB ROBERTS <=-
Whoops. Make that Bose, not Kosch. I think I was still
dreaming of owning Klipsch speakers someday and merged that with remembering the Bose, somehow.
Yes, I have a few actually, nothing really high end, but still decent. I have a FiiO K5 Pro that is attached to my desktop, a Cambridge Audio Azur which is next to my recliner attached to a laptop. And for portable devices I have a FiiO Q1 and a FiiO E10K and a Schiit Fulla.
They all sound great and have the power to push the IEMs and my headphones. I won't go back to plugging in directly to a computer ever again (for music).
BOB ROBERTS wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=-
Ahh, I was wondering if there would be a Schiit stack in there
somewhere. How do you like it? I've thought about getting one but
never have... I know they're popular on the interwebs. You've got some nice gear.
I agree. Before I got a DAC i thought they were stupid. But now that
I have one and have experienced it (a former boss talked me into
getting one) I would never go back. The way they process streaming
audio (like Hi-Res Tidal) takes the music up a notch.
What I would like to find now, is a decent portable (pocket sized) bluetooth DAC. I have bluetooth adapaters for my Shure IEMs and my
UE's, but they just don't have to power to drive the IEMs.
BOB ROBERTS wrote to KEVIN NUNN <=-
I've always assumed that the compression native in bluetooth would
defeat the fidelity gained by a DAC. I know there are some newer bluetooth profiles that are higher fidelity, but I'm assuming there is still some compression there. Also, it's so difficult to determine
what phones and headphones support what bluetooth codecs.
Bob Roberts wrote to August Abolins <=-
My first speakers in college were Bose. I blew them up with Nine Inch Nails.
I have a pair of Marantz HD-88s, nearly as old as I am, that still rock. I used to use them to deejay dances with back in the late 80s.
I have a pair of Marantz HD-88s, nearly as old as I am,
that still rock. I used to use them to deejay dances with
back in the late 80s.
If you're going to destroy speakers, that's good stuff to blow them up with
I have a pair of Marantz HD-88s, nearly as old as I am, that still rock. I used to use them to deejay dances with back in the late 80s.
Sysop: | Immortal |
---|---|
Location: | Spanish Fork, UT |
Users: | 13 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 18:11:32 |
Calls: | 374 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 3,375 |
Messages: | 96,329 |